Confessions of a 21st Century Indio

By in

When I was in grade school, my Sibika teachers taught me that very familiar lesson on the “Filipino race” on United Nations Week.  I was the palest kid in class, so I wore the suit and tie and represented the United States.  The darkest kid in class represented some African country, and there was always someone dressed in Filipiñana.  We were all called to the front, and ‘Tcher started the lesson:

When you mix white blood (pointing to me) and black blood (pointing to my classmate) together, you will get… (the class recites, “Filipino!”).

We started sampling foods in the school potluck, which pretty much reinforced the day’s lesson.  Dessert was very poignant: Halo-halo is a mixture of different ingredients from all over the world to create a Filipino dessert.

Taking up Anthropology in college was a scholarly adaptation of United Nations Week, without global cosplay and potluck buffet but with the addition of thick readings, but it still reinforced the notion of “mixtures.”  H. Otley Beyer, for example, defined two weeks of migratory patterns on a class one semester.  Waves of migration, as well as colonization, affirmed the mathematics of bloodline: black + white = brown.  Drawing pedigree charts would trace your lineage to anything but a “Filipino race,” but affirms the family story of coming from China and Spain, unearthing some possibility of a “dark” ancestor being married – or raped – by a “white” colonizer.

The cosmetics aisles of the supermarket are filled with shelves of whitening soaps, whitening lotions, and everything else to make you “white.”  There is a methodical detaching from “brown” that goes beyond skin care: the voluminous rants and raves of “Only in the Philippines,” and “Kasi naman ang Pinoy.” It’s a kind of bleaching that goes beyond papaya soap, like adapting a “conventional” name and place when you work in a call center, for example.  Or to leave the Philippines is to “seek greener pastures,” no longer pakikipagsapalaran. A word that, in itself, connotes poverty, promdi, and degradation.

Every undertone and overtone of it is racist: from the Sibika classes to the Anthro lectures, from glutathione creams to kutis-mayaman billboards in EDSA.  Or adjusting color and hue in Photoshop pictures to make one less brown than he or she should be.  It is the 21st century rebuilding – and reaffirming – of indio.

There’s a method to the whitewash.  Hundreds of years of colonization, and living in the shadow of Colony, strip people of pride and identity.  The white gleam of Agapito Flores’ light bulb is always juxtaposed against the color of his skin, so he never could have invented it.  Pacquiao, fighting in a white canvas, is brown, and therefore he’s not fighting for Filipino pride but is fighting for money, just like how Charice would sing among a white ensemble.  The success of colonization – and its vestiges in education – makes brown “inferior” because it is a mixture.  A bastard.  If races were dogs – Caucasoid, Negroid, and Mongoloid – then there’s no place for brown, and therefore it would be a mutt.

Reinforcing indio is “mixture:” brown skin is Negrito subjugated by Espanyol, giving rise to “medium” height and pango noses.

There are many things wrong with Filipino culture, yet they are founded on the basic premise of “mixtures,” and the method of oppression that goes with it.  If you were treated as a slave for 300 years, then you identify with the habits of the slave.  If you were treated as an inferior when you stood alongside white people because of the color of your skin, the flatness of your nose, and that you’re the shortest person in the crowd.  “Mixture” is to treat yourself as “impure,” and therefore you should be enslaved, and any effort you do to stand out from the crowd to give your people some measure of pride is questionable, because you’re brown.

I write this essay to emphasize that the reclamation of Filipino pride means to challenge race, and the structures of power created by race, that keep us away from pride.  Our struggle is no different from the black in America, the Korean in Japan: that we are continually subjugated by race.  Whether it’s the overt degradation of Filipinos in blog posts, or the subliminal humiliation of brown skin colors in glutathione therapy, “brown” is to stigmatize, to lump us in the Other of colors that aren’t “black” or “white.”  Yet the faults of Filipino culture are layers of colonial subjugation: faults impressed and emphasized to validate and justify things like polo y servicos, Manifest Destiny, the Greater East Asia Co-Prosperity Sphere, and “protecting” and “developing” the Filipino.  Post-colonization and neo-colonization that continue to drive Filipinos into a continued state of helplessness.

We cannot reclaim Pinoy pride solely through boxing matches or a catalogue of personalities, but to distance ourselves from slavery.  African-Americans rejoiced with Joe Louis, but continued to be defined by the Aunt Jemima’s and Uncle Ben’s of their stereotype.  Heck, it cannot be reclaimed by a blog post.  It takes a movement to correct the errors of education: to emphasize that we had sophisticated culture and governance before our colonizers subjugated and destroyed it with method.  It takes a movement to render race illegitimate, that it is the shallowest and most inane facet of human difference.  It takes a movement to reclaim our pride: that we are Filipino, that we are recovering from our addiction to Colony and driven out of place of our own country.

It starts with acknowledging the benefits of – and damage done by – colonization, revising schoolbooks and educational materials.  It starts with the de-emphasizing of race, and emphasizing that different ethnicities in the Philippines were lumped together and oppressed during colonization.  It starts with a new catalogue of Philippine history and emphasizing pre-colonial culture, defining who we are and who we came from.

Rizal once referred to “Indios Bravos,” perhaps in a satirical take to the derogatory term that the Spanish colonizers imposed upon us.  Perhaps we can reclaim it as well for ourselves in the 21st century, and reclaim every negative notion of Filipino, out of the “mixture” that it has been long steeped in.  The shift that I think can give us the one thing we have long been deprived of: the genuine pride that comes not from singers, from boxing matches, but from who we are and where we came from.

To be continued when I feel like it.

4 comments on “Confessions of a 21st Century Indio”

  1. Pingback: Tweets that mention Confessions of a 21st Century Indio « The Marocharim Experiment --

  2. Reply

    hope you feel like it soon. this is worth a continuing series, please ;))

    • tina
    • June 26, 2010

    this post seems to have some loose threads that need clarifying, or expounding on. (the motif of a mixture is pretty potent ^^ yet i think it can be written about in more depth, and breadth, too.) then again the post also reminds me of my own fractured sense of identity, which i accumulated over the years through incomplete history lessons and the occasional eye-opening news article or textbook chapter. i always have mixed feelings about this issue… for those of us who weren’t blessed with a clear sense of identity early on, it’s going to be a lifelong search, i guess. ^^;

    • BrianB
    • July 2, 2010

    So you think like me. Ha ha.

    Side note: The tikbalang and Kapre were invented as cautionary tales against Kastila rapists in the past. Yung mga na-rape ng tikbalang pumuputi ang anak. Kapres are less harmful–the exhibitionist version of the same story. That’s why only women have ever seen kapres.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *