By in


I think that any effort to promote awareness of cancer is one that should be lauded.  Whether you like Belo or not, you have to give them props that they’re doing everything they can to educate people on the merits of their new product.  There are the giant billboards at EDSA, there’s the I Just Did Web project, and here’s a handy-dandy PDF brochure that you can use to educate yourself on cervical cancer, and why you should get a vaccine.

I’m not a medical professional, but I never thought of a cancer that can be spread through a virus.  So, with a viral infection that gave me some strain of flu, I did what research I can.  The human papillomavirus (HPV) is, apparently, the leading cause of cervical cancer, although many instances of infection clear up on their own.  HPV infections are sexually transmitted.

Yet this document from the Center for Disease Control points out some rather interesting statements about the HPV vaccine:

  • The HPV vaccine is recommended for girls 9-12 years.  This ensures that they get protected from HPV before their first sexual contact.
  • Catch-up HPV vaccine is recommended for girls 13-26 years, who have not yet been vaccinated.  The vaccine will not “kill” existing HPV infections (if there is an infection to speak of), but can ward off other possible diseases caused by other strains of HPV.

More information about the vaccine is explained in the recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices.  Here’s a vaccine called Gardasil, manufactured by Merck; the prescribing sheet can be downloaded here.

Vaccines are preventative measures, which means that if you would risk exposure to the virus in question, you would be protected from a possible infection.  Vaccines are not cures.  This is the reason why you get vaccines when you’re still a child: all the flu shots in the world will not cure you of flu if you already have it before.  The same thing is true for HPV: while the Belo group is right in saying that Pap tests and regular screening are very important in controlling and managing cervical cancer, their advertising is very vague on:

  • Who should get the test;
  • When should a woman take the test, and;
  • How that test is administered.

These are parts of basic medical diagnosis, and prudence in the practice of medicine.

In these instances, I think that medical groups and companies should be very transparent on the products they’re selling, especially if a better-safe-than-sorry logic is used to justify vaccination, no matter how expensive it can get.  Of course it has something to do with serious business and advertising; that’s why you have to call up the clinic, visit the site, or visit them.

Yet I know very little of medicine, and I’m not an expert on it; it’s just that too many things do not compute.  I don’t need to get this vaccine, if only because I don’t have a cervix.  I just want more clarity and transparency from a regimen that’s supposed to save lives.  I’m not against vaccine if there is a solid, long-term basis for it; I’m just for a more transparent way of marketing pharmaceutical products in the medical profession.

If you’re looking at a less-than-transparent view of something as serious as cervical cancer, you’re not promoting interest and awareness at all.  Instead, you’re promoting the interests of a business.  I just hope it doesn’t turn out that way for the millions of Filipino women who are at risk of cervical cancer.

* – Picture from the Facebook page of the Belo Medical Group

4 comments on “Vaccine”

    • eloisa
    • July 15, 2009

    Thank you! Will forward this to people. The truth must come out!

  1. Reply


    it’s research, not “truth,” but i’d be more than happy to be edumacated by medical professionals.

    • meia
    • July 15, 2009

    As someone who does have the concerned “goods”, what I hate about this whole thing is the fad factor of the vaccine coupled with the alarmist message (and inversely, the reassurance that you can prevent cervical cancer by taking this seemingly miraculous shot) with this vaccine. Most posters I see advertising this vaccine more or less runs through the vein of, “If you love your kid, get this shot for her.”

    They always say that this can prevent cervical cancer, but the fact that 90% of HPV cases resolves on its own is NEVER mentioned. And 90% is a serious number. I’m not saying that the 10% off-chance you get cervical cancer should be scoffed at, but certainly a BETTER SEX ED IN OUR SCHOOLS COULD BE THE BEST WAY TO APPROACH THIS PROBLEM? People hawking this vaccine hardly ever mention that HPV is an STD/STI, it’s almost an afterthought.

    Maybe when our school system starts demystifying human genitalia, bring better understanding to how everything works, and how to be responsible for your own body, then we would be a much less alarmist/fad-ish society, which is a much better way to approach this issue.

  2. Reply


    Sounds like a cartel of vaccines to me.

    Don’t get me wrong: if you love your kid – and if you can afford it – you would make the HPV shots an option. But as I already pointed out in a mishmash of links (that I could have just placed at the bottom of the post, lol), the industry of “vaccine hawking” is being less than transparent into a disease which:

    1. Is sexually transmitted.
    2. Is costly.
    3. Is dangerous and life-threatening.

    To give cred to the Belo group, they did say that Pap tests and regular screening can help prevent cervical cancer.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *