Dear Girl #1: Your Boyfriend Looks Like…

   (This is an old topic that’s somewhere in Original TMX: I’ve observed that beautiful girls usually have ugly boyfriends.  I think it deserves a revisit, in a special section of “Dear Marocharim” I call, “Dear Girl.”  Enjoy.)

Dear Girl, 

   It’s not that I’m physically attractive or anything, but I find myself baffled: why, Girl, in all your sexiness and prettiness, would you pair yourself with Guy who looks like he got savagely beaten with the ugly stick?  Why, Girl, in all your infinite wisdom and your smartness, would you pair yourself with Guy who is, for all intents and purposes, a two-legged hamster?  Why, Girl, in all your vainglorious beauty bedecked with Gucci blouses, Donna Karan jeans and Louis Vuitton handbags studded with Swarovski crystals, do you insist on loving Guy who looks like, well, shit?

   I know, I know: you’re beyond being attracted to a man physically.  You believe that, like magnetism, opposites attract.  You like to think of yourself as someone who values personality more than looks.  You are tired of being used as a sex-doll, a romantic trophy, an ornamental girlfriend by some jock from years ago, who apparently turned out to be in more than one gay orgy that involved bubbly foam.

   Don’t tell me you haven’t heard… I’ve also heard that they also had a serious homo daisy-chain at the staircase.

   No, I’m not jealous: in fact, I pity you.  You’re so beautiful, and your man is so ugly, that I can’t even fathom how you two look like having sex.  I can’t imagine what your children will look like.  What do you see in him?  Really: have you actually split his skull in half and saw his brains?  Have you performed a triple-bypass surgery on him to see what his heart looks like?

   Girl, I’m calling it like I see it: your boyfriend looks like shit.  I know you love him and all.  I don’t question the fact that you love him, but how could you have loved him anyway?  How could you have loved him with that cancer on his cheek that looks like a monkey is growing out of it?  How could you have loved him with that nose that looks like a giraffe’s left testicle?  How could you have loved him with that eyeball hanging from his left eye socket?

   Girl, I’ll never understand you.  And I hope against all hopes that I won’t.

Sincerely yours,

Marocharim

P.S.: I think that your boyfriend was behind your jock ex on that daisy-chain in the staircase.  And no, I wasn’t there.

Blog Event Quotients, Sleepers, and Maro-Myths

   Today – OK, awhile ago – 150 or so bloggers from the Philippines trooped to TriNoma Mall in Quezon City to literally “pig out” at the TriNoma Bloggers’ Food Tour.  As I’m told (and man, did I miss it), bloggers ate out – for free – at participating establishments at TriNoma.

   DAMN!

   Yet again, an offline blogging event I missed.  I missed out on such important offline events as Bloggers’ Kapihan and iBlog3: all because I live far away from Metro Manila.  Of course, organizing an offline blog event here in Baguio City is out of the question (unless some corporate sponsor will do so).  Besides, I’m a terrible events organizer.

   Having a blog event quotient (BEQ) of zero, I think I can partly explain why The Marocharim Experiment is a “sleeper blog:” that is to say that while many people know that I exist, people really don’t have an idea of who I am.  The only notable exception in the Philippine blogosphere is Shari Cruz, who went to the same school I did, and says she sort of “stalked” my blog before.  The thing is, as much as we both know each other at face value, we never talked personally.

   It’s not that I’m “controversial” or anything, but I have heard what I call “Maro-Myths,” like:

  • I’m a sociopathic fat guy with big thick glasses and bad acne;
  • I’m an emo type who slashes his own wrists, and my personal favorite;
  • I am a paraphilic gay dude (which probably explains the sexual metaphors pertaining to anuses and fecal matter).

   One of my New Year blogging resolutions is to attend at least one offline blog event.  Oh sure, like they work.

Japanese Bug Fights

   It’s not like I’m Michael Vick or anything, but I did gamble twice on a cockfight.   Me and a couple of friends headed off long ago to the Lamtang Cockfighting Arena, made fifty-peso bets on a politician’s cock (so to speak), and came away winning P500.  Given how far Lamtang is (it’s a good 20 minutes away from Baguio), and given that I’m not an expert in cockfighting, I haven’t gone there since.

   The newest Internet sensation today (or so I’m told by my friends here at The Shop) is Japanese “bug fighting.”  JapaneseBugFights.com (JBF), which I assume is the World Wrestling Entertainment of bug fighting, has only three rules:

  1. Two bugs to a fight.
  2. Bug fights go on as long as they have to.
  3. No outside weapons in bug fights.

   For those of you tired of Manny Pacquiao matches or scripted ballet in pro wrestling, JBF offers matches like Scorpion vs. Beetle, Praying Mantis vs. Cockroach, Tarantula vs. Stick Insect, and Wasp vs. Cricket.  Surprisingly, I find JBF entertaining: as a kid, I used to play with small spiders that come inside wooden match boxes.  This is basically an extension of it, only that JBF comes with color commentary.  I’m starting to think that Big Black Beetle With Big Claws is the Undertaker of JBF, with Scorpion as its Batista.

   While it took me a while to appreciate soccer and that my interest in basketball has dwindled, I find myself increasingly being a fan of bug fighting.  Surely this is the pinnacle of entomological machismo: gladiatorial events in the insect world.  I’m sure that something like a ladybird or a grasshopper dreams of being the JBF champion.  Maximus’ most overused quote in Gladiator applies to insects as it does to humans: what we do in life echoes in eternity.

   Or at least in the short lifespan of a bug.

   Animal activists, of course, find this appalling.  The Jains, for example, would sweep aside a cockroach than to kill it.  The sanctity of life, universal as it is, should apply to insects: after all, they have “feelings.”  I think that the People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) will consider this “barbaric:” that anthropocentric cruelty will endanger the well-being of bugs, which “are people too.”

   That won’t stop me from watching it.

Funeral Parlors

   My uncle – who tonight left the Philippines to go back to work at Seattle – is thinking about putting up a business here instead of working abroad.  I made a joking suggestion about putting up a funeral parlor.  Surprisingly, he – along with my parents – look at it as a very good idea.

   In the indy movie Ataul for Rent, Joel Torre became rich – and mad – renting out coffins to his neighbors.  While Ataul is a good study in the nature of man, it led me to assume that there is profit in dead people.  For one, funeral parlors have a steady source of profit: people die all the time.  For two, we Filipinos spend so much in appeasing the souls of the reposed.  For three – and this is just me – I like the idea of driving a hearse.

   In my father’s hometown of La Union, “Joces” is a ubiquitous name: it is the most famous funeral parlor in Bauang, San Fernando City, and beyond.  What started out as a backyard funeral home turned into a multi-million peso family-owned franchise.  From what I’m told, Joces not only has a flexible payment rate, but it also rents out chairs and tents.  The people at Joces also provide free biscuit tins and brewed coffee to its clients to defray the costs of feeding mourners.

   (In case you think I “sold myself” to advertise a funeral home, I did that for free: nobody at Joces told me to write about them.  So there.)

   When my grandmother died a couple of years ago, I became very interested in the idea of being a mortician or a funeral director: even better yet, a driver of a hearse.  There’s something about driving a corpse around town in neutral gear.  While I’d prefer to stick my earphones in for anything other than “Hindi Kita Malilimutan.”